The roles and expectations of females and males differed greatly in post-classical |
Footbinding
In
addressing the subject of footbinding, one primary difficulty becomes apparent
- that much remains within the realm of the unknowable. Any factual knowledge
about the practice may only be drawn from 19th- and 20th-century writings,
drawings or photographs. In addition, many of these documents represent a
distinctly Western point of view, as they are primarily composed of missionary
accounts and the literature of the various anti -footbinding societies.[1] The historical
origins of footbinding are frustratingly vague, although brief textual
references suggest that small feet for women were preferred as early as the Han
dynasty. The first documented reference to the actual binding of a foot is from
the court of the Southern Tang dynasty in Nanjing, which celebrates the fame of
its dancing girls renowned for their tiny feet and beautiful bow shoes.[2] The practice
apparently became the standard for feminine beauty in the imperial court,
spreading downward socially and geographically as the lower classes strove to
imitate the style of the elite. [3]
In
its most extreme form, footbinding was the act of wrapping a three- to
five-year old girl's feet with binding so as to bend the toes under, break the
bones and force the back of the foot together. Its purpose was to produce a
tiny foot, the "golden lotus", which was three inches long and
thought to be both lovely and alluring.[4] It is believed that
the origin of the term "golden lotus" emerged in the Southern Tang
dynasty, where the emperor Li Yu ordered
his favorite concubine, Fragrant Girl, to bind her feet with silk bands and
dance on a golden lotus platform encrusted with pearls and gems. Thereafter,
women inside and outside the court began taking up strips of cloth and binding
their feet, thinking them beautiful and distinguished, dainty and elegant. It
gradually became the prevailing style and "golden lotus" became a
synonym for bound feet.[5]
Imperial
acceptance aside, the question that remains is why did Chinese women bind their
feet for approximately one thousand years, until forcibly prohibited by the
government? It is important to consider the practice without criticism in order
to understand the symbolic and personal meanings of footbinding, which embraced
a number of purposes. Its origins may be perceived as a means of enforcing the
imperial male's exclusive sexual access to his female consorts, ensuring their
chastity and fidelity, but its impact extended far beyond these boundaries.[10] Since the family
was the most important organizational unit in Chinese society, and the family
and the state often portrayed as analogous to each other, the emperor and the
empress were cast as mother and father to the people. The court's custom of
keeping women hidden was echoed in urban society at large, setting standards of
behavior that reduced women to a state of near-total domestic seclusion. In
those urban centers, such standards were widely observed by women who aspired
to elite status.[12]
In
a society with a cult of female chastity, one primary purpose of footbinding
was to limit mobility, radically modifying the means by which females were
permitted to become a part of the world at large. Painfully and forcibly
reducing a little girl's foot at the precise point in her life when she was
expected to begin understanding the Confucian discipline of maintaining a
"mindful body" reinforced her acceptance of the practice.[21] A woman's
dependency on her family was made utterly manifest in her disabled feet, and
she was fully expected to acquire considerable control over her pain,
reflecting the ideals of civility, a mindful body and concealment. One of the
primary allures of footbinding lay in its concealment, and to be acceptable a
pair of small feet had to be covered by binder, socks and shoes, doused in
perfurne and scented powder, and then hidden under layers of leggings and
skirts.[22] Women also
attended to their feet in the strictest privacy, often washing their feet
separately from the rest of their body to shield themselves and others from
contamination.[23] Only those
privileged to the utmost intimacy were allowed to view the processes of
cleansing and care, and women wore special bed slippers even if otherwise
nude.[24] Much of
footbinding's aura derived from this concealment of the physicality of the
foot, mirroring the privacy requirements society and family placed on the
individual.
Source:
Marie Vento
History of Footbinding
Living as a MALE in Post-Classical China
The roles and expectations of females and males differed greatly in
post-classical
|
It was thought best for a boy to start upon his studies as early as possible. From the very beginning, he was instructed almost entirely in the classics, since mathematics could be left to merchants, while science and technology were relegated to the working class. A potential grand official must study the Four Books, the Five Classics, and other Confucian works, and, further, he must know how to compose poems and write essays. For the most part, questions in civil service examinations did not go beyond these areas of competence.
When
he was just a little more than three years old, a boy's education began at
home, under the supervision of his mother or some other suitable person. Even
at this early stage, the child's home environment exerted a great effect upon
his development. In cultivated families, where books were stacked high against
the walls, the baby sitter taught the boy his first characters while playing.
Formal education began at
about seven years of age (or eight, counting in Chinese style). Boys from
families that could afford the expense were sent to a temple, village,
communal, or private school staffed by former officials who had lost their
positions, or by old scholars who had repeatedly failed the examinations as
the years slipped by. Sons of rich men and powerful officials often were taught
at home by a family tutor in an elegant small room located in a detached
building, which stood in a courtyard planted with trees and shrubs, in order to
create an atmosphere conducive to study.
A
class usually consisted of eight or nine students. Instruction centered on the
Four Books, beginning with the Analects, and the process of learning was
almost entirely a matter of sheer memorization. With their books open before
them, the students would parrot the teacher, phrase by phrase, as he read out
the text. Inattentive students, or those who amused themselves by playing with
toys hidden in their sleeves, would be scolded by the teacher or hit on the
palms and thighs with his fan-shaped "warning ruler." The high regard
for discipline was reflected in the saying, "If education is not strict,
it shows that the teacher is lazy."
Students who had learned
how to read a passage would return to their seats and review what they had just
been taught. After reciting it a hundred times, fifty times while looking at
the book and fifty with the book face down, even the least gifted would have
memorized it. At first, the boys were given twenty to thirty characters a day,
but as they became more experienced, they memorized one, two, or several
hundred each day. In order not to force a student beyond his capacity, a boy
who could memorize four hundred characters would be assigned no more than two
hundred. Otherwise, he might become so distressed as to end by detesting his
studies.
To enrich your family, no need to buy good land:
Books hold a thousand measures of grain.
For an easy life, no need to build a mansion:
In books are found houses of gold.
Going out,
be not vexed at absence of followers:
In
books, carriages and horses form a crowd;
Marrying,
be not vexed by lack of a good go-between:
In
books there are girls and faces of jade.
A boy
who wants to become a somebody
Devotes
himself to the classics, faces the window, and reads.
No comments:
Post a Comment